Round 3: Tossup 4

In this field of law, the “People” case established the doctrine of “legal impossibility,” distinct from “factual impossibility.” A namesake “conversation” in this field of law is similar to a breach of promise but has been abolished by over half of US states. “Mistakes of fact” in this field of law (10[1])are distinct from “mistakes of law,” which are often excluded for violating ignorantia juris (10[1])non excusat. This field of law divides its central subject into mala in se and mala prohibita types. Jurisdictions place value on this field of law’s objectives of retribution, (10[1])deterrence, and restoration. (10[1])In this field of law, the external element is sometimes equated to the actus reus, which is often required as proof alongside the mens rea. For (10[1])10 points, what field of law concerns personal offenses like battery and assault? ■END■

ANSWER: criminal law [accept criminal conversation; prompt on criminology; reject “tort law”]
<NS, Social Science> | Packet-D_CWRU-A_Iowa_Toronto-A_WashU-A
= Average correct buzzpoint

Back to tossups

Buzzes


Summary

TournamentEditionMatchHeardConv. %Neg %Avg. Buzz
California2025-02-01✓3100%33%104.33
Florida2025-02-01✓3100%0%106.00
Lower Mid-Atlantic2025-02-01✓6100%33%110.50
Midwest2025-02-01✓6100%0%90.33
North2025-02-01✓3100%33%117.67
Northeast2025-02-01✓5100%0%85.00
Pacific Northwest2025-02-01✓250%0%101.00
South Central2025-02-01✓2100%50%96.00
Southeast2025-02-01✓475%50%129.33
UK2025-02-01✓10100%60%116.60
Upper Mid-Atlantic2025-02-01✓8100%25%116.25
Upstate NY2025-02-01✓3100%0%128.00