Packet G: Bonus 19
A posthumous 2013 book that collects John Haugeland’s writings on Martin Heidegger has a title that references both Dasein (“DAH-zyne”) and this process. For 10 points each:
[10h] Heidegger’s notion by which the meaning of things “opens up” in their context is typically translated as a “world” form of what process? Nikolas Kompridis drew on Heidegger to theorize this process’s “reflective” form.
ANSWER: disclosure [accept word forms like disclosedness; accept Erschlossenheit; accept Dasein Disclosed]
[10e] The claim that “every disclosure of being as the transcendens is transcendental knowledge” appears in this 1927 book considered Heidegger’s magnum opus.
ANSWER: Being and Time [or Sein und Zeit]
[10m] This philosopher attacked Heidegger’s “world disclosure” as devaluing reason in The Philosophical Discourses of Modernity. This member of the Frankfurt School theorized communicative rationality with Karl-Otto Apel.
ANSWER: Jürgen Habermas
<TM, Philosophy> | Packet-G_Chicago-B_Ohio-State-A_UW-B
| Heard | PPB | E % | M % | H % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 11.67 | 93% | 23% | 0% |
Conversion
| Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASU | TAMU | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Bristol | Cambridge D | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Bruin A | Georgia Tech D | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Cambridge A | Cambridge E | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Cambridge B | Warwick B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Cambridge C | Warwick A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Chicago C | Illinois C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Columbia B | NYU A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Georgia Tech C | Georgia Tech A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Harvard A | Brandeis A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Haverford A | Columbia C | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Illinois A | Chicago A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Illinois B | Chicago D | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Imperial A | NYU C | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Indiana A | Indiana B | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| MIT A | Tufts A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Maryland A | John Jay College | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Missouri | WashU B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| NYU B | Yale A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Northwestern A | Notre Dame C | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Notre Dame A | Stanford B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Purdue | Georgetown B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Rutgers A | George Washington A | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Sheffield | Imperial B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Southampton A | Oxford A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Texas B | Texas A | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| UC Berkeley A | UC Berkeley B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| UNC B | Liberty B | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Virginia A | South Carolina | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Virginia Tech A | Duke | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | EM |
Summary
| Tournament | Edition | Match | Heard | PPB | E % | M % | H % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | 2025-02-01 | ✓ | 1 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Lower Mid-Atlantic | 2025-02-01 | ✓ | 3 | 13.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% |
| Midwest | 2025-02-01 | ✓ | 5 | 10.00 | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| Northeast | 2025-02-01 | ✓ | 2 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Overflow | 2025-02-01 | ✓ | 3 | 10.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| South Central | 2025-02-01 | ✓ | 2 | 15.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% |
| Southeast | 2025-02-01 | ✓ | 2 | 15.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% |
| UK | 2025-02-01 | ✓ | 7 | 11.43 | 100% | 14% | 0% |
| Upper Mid-Atlantic | 2025-02-01 | ✓ | 5 | 12.00 | 80% | 40% | 0% |